

Test speed with different frequencies (5180, 5260 etc.) and different channel widths.ĥ. Set basic configuration for wireless like:īand=5ghz-a/n/ac channel-width=20/40/80mhz-Ceee mode=ap-bridge country=(your country)Ĥ. system reset-configuration no-defaults=yes skip-backup=yesģ.
99.00 INSSIDER OFFICE UPDATE
Update router to latest RouterOS release candidate as well as update firmware in /system routerboard. Thank you for contacting MikroTik support and investigating this!ġ. message received from MikroTik Support. The words in red were coloured by me on purpose.

How about yours guys? Are you ALWAYS able to get a stable and high data rate at 300Mbps over a long time of time, eg. When I have time, I shall follow his guide to see whether I can or cannot obtain the results as he mentioned. Also he could get very good results of 300Mbps via the WiFi. However he said that he was not able to replicate the problems that I had.

I the following command to initiate the testįinally, I am able to receive a formal reply from MikroTik about the problems found in hAP ac^2, as follows. I do believe MikroTik dealers, agents or distributors would not place any orders for this product until MikroTik resolves this WiFi issue. I do believe based on those values, any customers can return the unit(s) to the agents, dealers or distributors without any questions. It indicates that over 20 retries over 1 second of time. It is 7390 counts over 5 minutes of time. Also the packet retry rate for the 5G WiFi was almost doubled as shown in Figure 7. Even though MikroTik provided an RC version of firmware v6.4rc56 (up to this moment of writing), the WiFi performance is still unacceptable.
99.00 INSSIDER OFFICE DOWNLOAD
When we compare the results in Listing 5 (5G) and Listing 6 (2.4G), the 5G ac download speed is lower than that of 2.4G.

However the packet retry count is 3541 over 5-minute period of time. The average download speed is only 16.2Mbps, which has been reported by many MikroTik users. Listing 5 shows the stock item of hAP ac^2's 5G performance. In general RouterOS without WiFi works very well as seen in Retr value in Listings 1 and 9. Whenever you read the subsequent listings, please put your concentration on i) Bandwidth and ii) Retr value. In the following results, we can measure how good/bad of the wired/wireless link using the 5-minute iperf3 download test. Instead we may use the actual file downloading test or MikroTik Bandwidth test.įigure 3: WLAN (2.4G)LAN file download testįigure 4: WLAN (5G)LAN file download testįigure 5: iperf3 test for LAN-LAN connectionĪfter having inspired by nemoforum, I learned the way to determine the download speed (WAN->WLAN) using iperf3 with the option -R. In general I would not carry out iperf3 test because it does not reflect the actual performance of the router. Thanks!Īs per your request, I have done a number of tests relating the issue "LAN(eth) WLAN" that you concerned as follows:įigure 1 shows the setup configuration for the subsequent tests including LAN-to-LAN, WLAN (2.4G) to LAN and finally WLAN (5G) to LAN.įigure 3 shows the WLAN (2.4G) to LAN speedįigure 4 shows the WLAN (5G) to LAN speedįigure 5 shows iperf3 results of LAN-to-LAN connectionįigure 6 shows iperf3 results of WLAN (2.4G) to LAN connectionįigure 7 shows iperf3 results of WLAN (5G) to LAN connection It cannot keep at a rough stable state.Ĭould you please also make LAN(eth) WLAN tests, as I did in another topic. As you can see the results are very choppy and NOT STABLE. Figure 3 shows the 5G WiFi performance when I connected my laptop computer to the hAP ac^2 via 5G ac wireless link. The readings shown on the chart are very good and I am happy with it.
99.00 INSSIDER OFFICE PRO
I downloaded a large file of 10G size from the file server to my laptop computer (MacBook Pro Retinar). Figure 2 shows the performance when the laptop computer was connected to hAP ac^2 router via LAN cable. There is a file server (NAS) connected to one of LAN ports of CCR1009 router. In order to refresh the MikroTik's big brain, I use the following diagrams to illustrate.įigure 1 shows the basic setup for the tests carried out later. However they have not asked for any details up to this moment except asking me for renewal my MikroTik Certificate.Īnyway they can easily replicate the problems that we have. I have also sent an e-mail to the Support at the same day as you did. Jarda, thank you very much for relaying my concerns to MikroTik Support.
